![]() |
Chat - New Version - Support - Info - Money |
|
|
|
#331 |
|
No Fe@r
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: U.S.A/Canada
Posts: 14,559
![]() ![]() ![]() |
Re: Analysis and Theory
I find this denial statement from Al Tawhid Group to be very interesting. Some problems in their coalition?
A statement from the organization of the jihad rule in Mesopotamia around the last events in Karbala and Najaf http://www.itshappening.com/showthr...102#post1925102
__________________
~Casey The current ItsHappening forum is here: http://wincoast.com/forum/index.php WorldAnalysis.net http://worldanalysis.net |
|
|
|
|
#332 |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Nov 2004
Age: 70
Posts: 668
![]() |
Re: Analysis and Theory
<CENTER><TABLE width="80%"><TBODY><TR><TD align=left></TD><TD align=middle> </TD><TD align=right>Next</TD></TR></TBODY></TABLE></CENTER><HR align=center noShade SIZE=3>
<TABLE cellSpacing=0 cellPadding=0 width="99%" border=0><TBODY><TR vAlign=center align=left><TD vAlign=top align=left width="50%" colSpan=4> </TD><TD vAlign=top align=left width="50%" colSpan=4>APPROVED FOR RELEASE </TD></TR><TR vAlign=center align=left><TD vAlign=top align=left width="50%" colSpan=4> </TD><TD vAlign=top align=left width="50%" colSpan=4>CIA HISTORICAL REVIEW PROGRAM</TD></TR><TR vAlign=center align=left><TD vAlign=top align=left width="50%" colSpan=4> </TD><TD vAlign=top align=left width="50%" colSpan=4>22 SEPT 93</TD></TR><TR vAlign=center align=left><TD vAlign=top align=left width="24%"> </TD><TD vAlign=top align=left width="1%"> </TD><TD vAlign=top align=left width="3%"> </TD><TD vAlign=top align=left width="21%"> </TD><TD vAlign=top align=left width="24%"> </TD><TD vAlign=top align=left width="3%"> </TD><TD vAlign=top align=left width="24%" colSpan=2> </TD></TR><TR vAlign=center align=left><TD vAlign=top align=left width="24%"> </TD><TD vAlign=top align=left width="1%"> </TD><TD vAlign=top align=left width="3%"> </TD><TD vAlign=top align=left width="21%"> </TD><TD vAlign=top align=left width="24%"> </TD><TD vAlign=top align=left width="3%"> </TD><TD vAlign=top align=left width="24%" colSpan=2> </TD></TR><TR vAlign=center align=left><TD vAlign=top align=left width="24%"> </TD><TD vAlign=top align=left width="1%"> </TD><TD vAlign=top align=left width="3%"> </TD><TD vAlign=top align=left width="21%"> </TD><TD vAlign=top align=left width="24%"> </TD><TD vAlign=top align=left width="3%"> </TD><TD vAlign=top align=left width="24%" colSpan=2>
<HR align=center noShade SIZE=3><CENTER><TABLE width="80%"><TBODY><TR><TD align=left></TD><TD align=middle> </TD><TD align=right>Next</TD></TR></TBODY></TABLE></CENTER><STRIKE> CONFIDENTIAL </STRIKE>
</TD></TR><TR vAlign=center align=left><TD vAlign=top align=left width="24%"> </TD><TD vAlign=top align=left width="1%"> </TD><TD vAlign=top align=left width="3%"> </TD><TD vAlign=top align=left width="21%"> </TD><TD vAlign=top align=left width="24%"> </TD><TD vAlign=top align=left width="3%"> </TD><TD vAlign=top align=left width="20%"> </TD><TD vAlign=top align=left width="4%"> </TD></TR><TR vAlign=center align=left><TD vAlign=top align=left width="49%" colSpan=4>A "master craftsman" from State's intelligence bureau takes up a challenge and presents the case</TD><TD vAlign=top align=left width="24%"> </TD><TD vAlign=top align=left width="3%"> </TD><TD vAlign=top align=left width="20%"> </TD><TD vAlign=top align=left width="4%"> </TD></TR><TR vAlign=center align=left><TD vAlign=top align=left width="24%"> </TD><TD vAlign=top align=left width="1%"> </TD><TD vAlign=top align=left width="3%"> </TD><TD vAlign=top align=left width="21%"> </TD><TD vAlign=top align=left width="24%"> </TD><TD vAlign=top align=left width="3%"> </TD><TD vAlign=top align=left width="20%"> </TD><TD vAlign=top align=left width="4%"> </TD></TR><TR vAlign=center align=left><TD vAlign=top align=left width="100%" colSpan=8>AGAINST FOOTNOTES
</TD></TR><TR vAlign=center align=left><TD vAlign=top align=middle width="100%" colSpan=8> Allan Evans
</TD></TR><TR vAlign=center align=left><TD vAlign=top align=left width="24%"> </TD><TD vAlign=top align=left width="1%"> </TD><TD vAlign=top align=left width="3%"> </TD><TD vAlign=top align=left width="21%"> </TD><TD vAlign=top align=left width="24%"> </TD><TD vAlign=top align=left width="3%"> </TD><TD vAlign=top align=left width="20%"> </TD><TD vAlign=top align=left width="4%"> </TD></TR><TR vAlign=center align=left><TD vAlign=top align=left width="100%" colSpan=8>The eloquent lead article in the last issue <SUP>1 </SUP>challenges anyone to come forth with a valid defense of the status quo that prevails in our community with respect to footnotes. Age predisposes me to defend status quos; my frequent statements in talking to intelligence officer groups put me on the spot to repeat my arguments against the use of footnotes. It may be that these views are conditioned by circumstances in the Department of State and that these circumstances differ materially from those in the Department of Defense </TD></TR><TR vAlign=center align=left><TD vAlign=top align=left width="100%" colSpan=8> </TD></TR><TR vAlign=center align=left><TD vAlign=top align=left width="100%" colSpan=8>if so, it will be all the more useful to unearth variations in the taste and requirements of major groups of consumers at whom our community is aiming. Let us see what can be said. </TD></TR><TR vAlign=center align=left><TD vAlign=top align=left width="24%"> </TD><TD vAlign=top align=left width="1%"> </TD><TD vAlign=top align=left width="3%"> </TD><TD vAlign=top align=left width="21%"> </TD><TD vAlign=top align=left width="24%"> </TD><TD vAlign=top align=left width="3%"> </TD><TD vAlign=top align=left width="20%"> </TD><TD vAlign=top align=left width="4%"> </TD></TR><TR vAlign=center align=left><TD vAlign=top align=left width="25%" colSpan=2>Customer is King </TD><TD vAlign=top align=left width="3%"> </TD><TD vAlign=top align=left width="21%"> </TD><TD vAlign=top align=left width="24%"> </TD><TD vAlign=top align=left width="3%"> </TD><TD vAlign=top align=left width="20%"> </TD><TD vAlign=top align=left width="4%"> </TD></TR><TR vAlign=center align=left><TD vAlign=top align=left width="24%"> </TD><TD vAlign=top align=left width="1%"> </TD><TD vAlign=top align=left width="3%"> </TD><TD vAlign=top align=left width="21%"> </TD><TD vAlign=top align=left width="24%"> </TD><TD vAlign=top align=left width="3%"> </TD><TD vAlign=top align=left width="20%"> </TD><TD vAlign=top align=left width="4%"> </TD></TR><TR vAlign=center align=left><TD vAlign=top align=left width="100%" colSpan=8>The first and most important arguments are that our customers won't read fat papers and "almost certainly" in overwhelming majority don't want to be bothered with documentation. I think no truth in our business is more thoroughly substantiated by experience (either footnoted or not) than that the impact of a paper varies in close inverse relation to its size. We have, of course, the NIS, which is indifferent to bigness, but it is an intelligence document of a very special kind, designed for univgTsal reference. The Department of State issues stout papers, but for policy more often than intelligence purposes. There are technical areas of the government which revel in extensive analyses. So far, however, as the general run of dayto-day operation in this Department goes, our Bureau is prepared to stand by the idea that, other things being equal, the shortest paper has the most impact. </TD></TR><TR vAlign=center align=left><TD vAlign=top align=left width="100%" colSpan=8> </TD></TR><TR vAlign=center align=left><TD vAlign=top align=left width="100%" colSpan=8>In closely related vein, our consumers are not going to spend their time summoning up the documents they see referred to in footnotes. </TD></TR><TR vAlign=center align=left><TD vAlign=top align=left width="100%" colSpan=8> </TD></TR><TR vAlign=center align=left><TD vAlign=top align=left width="100%" colSpan=8></TD></TR><TR vAlign=center align=left><TD vAlign=top align=left width="100%" colSpan=8><SUP>1</SUP> A. John Alexander, "An Intelligence Role for the Footnote," Studies VIII 3, p. 1 ff. </TD></TR><TR vAlign=center align=left><TD vAlign=top align=left width="24%"> </TD><TD vAlign=top align=left width="1%"> </TD><TD vAlign=top align=left width="3%"> </TD><TD vAlign=top align=left width="21%"> </TD><TD vAlign=top align=left width="24%"> </TD><TD vAlign=top align=left width="3%"> </TD><TD vAlign=top align=left width="20%"> </TD><TD vAlign=top align=left width="4%"> </TD></TR><TR vAlign=center align=left><TD vAlign=top align=left width="24%"><STRIKE> CONFIDENTIAL </STRIKE></TD><TD vAlign=top align=left width="1%"> </TD><TD vAlign=top align=left width="3%"> </TD><TD vAlign=top align=left width="21%"> </TD><TD vAlign=top align=left width="24%"> </TD><TD vAlign=top align=left width="3%"> </TD><TD vAlign=top align=left width="20%"> </TD><TD vAlign=top align=left width="4%">81
</TD></TR></TBODY></TABLE> |
|
|
|
|
#333 |
|
nucleur infidel
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: water wonderlands
Posts: 7,162
![]() |
Re: Analysis and Theory
Addressing the roots of terrorism
Electronic Iraq Sat, 08 Jan 2005 11:36 AM PST The Bush administration keeps telling us that Osama bin Laden and his al-Qaeda terrorist network attacked the U.S. because "they hate our freedom." This is a very dangerous misconception, and one that will continue to impede any progress towards Middle East peace or winning the "war on terror Death toll passes 150,000 The Chronicle Herald Sun, 09 Jan 2005 1:08 AM PST WASHINGTON - The world may be better off if Osama bin Laden remains at large, according to the Central Intelligence Agency's recently departed executive director. Let bin Laden stay free, says ex-No. 3 CIA man WorldNet Daily Sat, 08 Jan 2005 10:04 PM PST Three years after the attack on New York's World Trade Center, the manhunt for Osama bin Laden has failed to produce the world's most wanted terrorist, and, according to the former No. 3 man at the CIA, that's just fine.
__________________
al allah akhbar making love to blue eyed devils in a tent
|
|
|
|
|
#334 |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Nov 2004
Age: 70
Posts: 668
![]() |
Re: Analysis and Theory...multinational jihads
About 1,000 ethnic Russians take part in Jihad
http://www.kavkazcenter.com/eng/img.php?id=3524 Moscow-based Credo.ru religious website reported that today you can say for sure that the structure of Military Councils (Jamaats) is now existing in all republics of the North Caucasus. The reason why they are working deep underground is that they have no formalized structure that would be manifested on the outside. In each republic there are several dozens of Resistance Fighters (Mujahideen) of both sexes, who are well-trained and ready to do anything. And if necessary, hundreds of more people can be mobilized. The Russian religious website points out that War Councils used to be mono-ethnic, but they were represented not only by the title nations of the republics, but by ethnic minorities as well. Some time ago it became known that even «Kumykian War Council» was taking part in sabotage operations in Moscow. Some most recent facts are revealing that a steady 'internationalization' of War Councils is now under way. There is the information that about 1,000 ethnic Russians, who were converted to Islam, are now participating in the Islamic Jihad. Credo.ru reported that some of the former skinheads have joined the Russian War Council. |
|
|
|
|
#335 |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Nov 2004
Age: 70
Posts: 668
![]() |
Re: Analysis and Theory...expansionism
Jihad in North Caucasus expanding
http://www.kavkazcenter.com/eng/img.php?id=3523 This is the topic that German newspaper Frankfurter Rundschau dedicated its article to. The newspaper mentions that out of 900,000 natives of Kabardino-Balkaria half are Muslims. Over the past few years thousands of young Muslims became followers of 39-year-old Islamic scholar Musa Mukoshev, who is hated by the Russians and by the local (pro-Moscow) authorities. Mr. Mukoshev studied the Koran in Saudi Arabia and Jordan. The Yarmuk War Council was set up two and a half years ago. Its purpose is to establish an Islamic state in the Caucasus. The police records, which were shown to a German reporter, contain the names of 430 Muslims suspected in having ties to Yarmuk War Council. Of course, the records are fake. The police are driving around the villages and taking the names of the Muslims who pray in a mosque 5 times a day. Nevertheless, these Muslims can be kidnapped and tortured by Russian invaders and their puppets from among the national traitors at any time. Last year the police brutally murdered Rassul Zakoyev. The butchers brought him to the «religious extremism department» and were brutally torturing him all night long. They were demanding that he tells them who supplies food and mobile phones to Chechen Fighters. The next evening the butchers dumped him out on the city's junkyard without getting the 'confession' that they wanted. In the hospital the doctors discovered traces of syringe needles under his fingernails. His legs had traces of electric shock and his body had traces of cigarettes that the pro-Russian cops were putting out on his skin. Rassul Zakoyev died on October 4, 2004 in the intensive care unit because his kidneys, his liver and his lungs stopped functioning, and because his cranium was fractured. After such atrocities Muslims start viewing the War Councils as their liberators. The puppet police put Mr. Ruslan Nakhushev, 47, on the list of the 430 enemies of the Russian state. Back in late '90s Mr. Nakhushev was helping Russian general Lebed to get the hostages released. And in 2002 he set up the Center for Muslim Research. Mr. Nakhushev believes that the more 'Islamists' and 'terrorists' the local authorities think up for themselves, the more money they will get from Moscow. From 1991 to 1998 the number of police officers in Kabardino-Balkaria increased from 1,800 to 10,000. Mr. Zakoyev's parents filed a report with the police to have the police find the murderers of their son, out of the 10,000 policemen. Of course they did not find anybody. One of Mr. Zakoyev's friends told the German reported, «This is only the beginning. Soon the youth will become real Mujahideen (Resistance Fighters)». |
|
|
|
|
#336 |
|
Searcher
Join Date: Dec 2002
Posts: 1,799
![]() |
Re: Analysis and Theory
al_gy, do you have links for the last two posts? Thank you!
__________________
“We will always be prepared, so we may always be free.” Ronald Reagan |
|
|
|
|
#337 | |
|
No Fe@r
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: U.S.A/Canada
Posts: 14,559
![]() ![]() ![]() |
Re: Analysis and Theory
Quote:
Hi Petronas. I'm not sure when al_gy will be back, here's the links. Jihad in North Caucasus expanding http://kavkazcenter.com/eng/article.php?id=3523 About 1,000 ethnic Russians take part in Jihad http://kavkazcenter.com/eng/article.php?id=3524
__________________
~Casey The current ItsHappening forum is here: http://wincoast.com/forum/index.php WorldAnalysis.net http://worldanalysis.net |
|
|
|
|
|
#338 |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Ohio
Age: 27
Posts: 301
![]() |
Re: Analysis and Theory
Ritter: June date set for attack on Iran www.rawstory.com
I was thinking, it might be beneficial to the Bush administration if the U.S. was attacked sometime soon so that they'd have an easier time going into Iran. Probably a Tuesday right? Al Zawahiri released a videotape today, revising down number of Americans killed, maybe more research? How would tomorrow suffice? 2-22-2005? Maybe even 4 seperate attacks. Just conjecture. Of course this would only be right if there wer some crazy world conspiracy. Hogwash. |
|
|
|
|
#339 | |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Nov 2004
Age: 70
Posts: 668
![]() |
Re: Analysis and Theory
Quote:
|
|
|
|
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|